Saturday, April 28, 2012

How to challenge that low appraisal


A low appraisal can prevent you from buying or selling a home at the price you have negotiated. Here's what you can do about it.

By Michele Lerner of HSH.com

In the volatile real-estate market of the past several years, prospective homebuyers and refinancers have encountered the same frustrating obstacle: a low appraisal.
Appraisal complaints have risen in recent years, particularly since home values began plummeting in 2007 and the Home Valuation Code of Conduct took effect in May 2009. But the experts say this isn't the first real-estate cycle in which contract prices don't often match an appraised value.


"Everyone needs to understand that real-estate appraisers report the market; we don't make the market," says Sara Stephens, president of The Appraisal Institute and principal of Richard A. Stephens and Associates in Little Rock, Ark. "We gather information, analyze it and make a report."


Why appraisals can come in low
A low appraisal is not necessarily wrong, but it does create a situation in which a lender may not approve the loan. Simply stated, appraisers compare the value of a home with the comparable properties, or "comps," in the surrounding area.




Buyers and refinancers often run into trouble when lenders use an appraisal management company to hire an appraiser who doesn't know the local nuances that could affect home values. In markets plagued by foreclosures or short sales, the surrounding comps can weigh down the price of a home in good standing. Or, if there have been few home sales in a given neighborhood, appraisers may be forced to look for comps in surrounding areas where market conditions and the homes may be different.


"Appraisals are a moving target and are based on closed sales, which can be a problem when there are few closed sales to use for comparable properties," says Carole Short, a sales associate with Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage in Dunwoody, Ga.


While homebuyers and homeowners cannot control a property appraisal, they can influence and challenge it if need be.



Educate the appraiser
"I recommend that [real-estate agents] and homeowners prepare written materials for an appraiser that include information about home improvements and anything else they know about the property that can improve its value. This can improve the chances for a higher appraisal," says Amy Tierce, regional vice president for Fairway Independent Mortgage in Boston.



Stephens recommends that sellers be present at an appraisal. While lenders are held at arm's length and cannot directly communicate with an appraiser, real-estate agents, buyers and sellers are allowed to talk to the appraiser. Agents can present the appraiser with information on comparable sales and how they came up with their sale price.


How to challenge a low appraisal
An appraisal dictates how much money lenders are willing to lend to a borrower. If a home's value is determined to be less than the preapproved loan amount, the lender cannot approve the loan. Buyers have the following five options when challenging a low appraisal:




1. Cancel the contract. Short says that almost all sale contracts today are written with an appraisal contingency that allows buyers and sellers to cancel the contract if the appraisal comes in too low.


2. Negotiate a new deal. "Buyers are allowed to challenge a low appraisal, but usually they prefer to renegotiate the contract," Short says. "A lot of buyers are actually excited if an appraisal comes in for $20,000 less than they offered because they assume they can negotiate to buy the house they want for less money." But that's only if sellers are willing to accept the lower price, which many times they're not.


3. Pay extra. "Every negotiation is specific to the individual circumstances of the contract, how much the buyers want the house and whether the sellers are willing to drop the price or assist with the financing," Short says.



Not all sellers are willing to negotiate, however. So sometimes after an appraisal comes in low, buyers must pay additional cash in order to meet the agreed-upon sale price. Tierce says negotiations should be as creative as possible, including seller financing or other concessions.


4. Challenge the paperwork. Stephens says the individual who pays for the appraisal, typically the buyer, can request a copy of the appraisal and review it. Short says real-estate agents and buyers would need to provide additional facts about comps or point out mistakes regarding such items as the number of square feet or the number of bedrooms.


"You should check the comps to be sure they have geographic relevance and the same interior and exterior features," Stephens says. "You can also hire another appraiser to do a review of the appraisal for an additional cost."



5. Request a second appraisal. "If a challenge or a review doesn't change the appraisal, then a buyer can ask their lender to hire another appraiser," Stephens says. "Be sure to request someone with geographical knowledge and someone competent and explain why you are asking for a second appraisal."


Short says either the buyer or the seller can challenge an appraisal or even request a second appraisal. "A challenge should be based on specific errors rather than opinions."








Thursday, April 26, 2012

What are the best cities for raising a family?

By Blaze Bullock, Deseret News


1. Grand Rapids, Michigan

Grand Rapids, Michigan

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 65
Cost of living index: 6
Housing affordability: 7
Commuting: 22
Percent owning homes: 5 (75%)
Crime: 27
Education: 35

Grand Rapids has multiple furniture making companies and there are several charter schools to supplement the public school system.

2. Boise, Idaho

Boise, Idaho

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 64
Cost of living index: 44
Housing affordability: 34
Commuting: 23
Percent owning homes: 29 (69%)
Crime: 5
Education: 1

Boise is the third biggest city in the Pacific Northwest and has less crime and lower costs than Portland and Seattle.

3. Provo, Utah

Provo, Utah

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 33
Cost of living index: 10
Housing affordability: 54
Commuting: 34
Percent owning homes: 59 (65%)
Crime: 1
Education: 11

Housing can be a little expensive but the cost of living is pretty low. This city has a lower crime rate than any other metro in the U.S.

4. Youngstown, Ohio

Youngstown, Ohio

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 96
Cost of living index: 18
Housing affordability: 1
Commuting: 27
Percent owning homes: 10 (73%)
Crime: 31
Education: 21

Youngstown has good schools and affordable costs even though it struggles with the bad economy.

5. Raleigh, North Carolina

Raleigh, North Carolina

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 19
Cost of living index: 32
Housing affordability: 56
Commuting: 54
Percent owning homes: 32 (69%)
Crime: 12
Education: 4

Commuters drive 25 extra hours a year in Raleigh compared to the national average but that only equates to about 10 minutes a day. This city is in the top fifth in median income in the nation.

6. Poughkeepsie, New York

Poughkeepsie, New York

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 8
Cost of living index: 86
Housing affordability: 67
Commuting: 4
Percent owning homes: 15 (72%)
Crime: 3
Education: 34

Yes, the costs of this city are high, but the incomes are high as well and the crime rate is one of the nation's lowest.


7. Omaha, Nebraska

Omaha, Nebraska

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 34
Cost of living index: 8
Housing affordability: 24
Commuting: 37
Percent owning homes: 16 (71%)
Crime: 43
Education: 56

Apparently Warren Buffet knows value.



8. Ogden, Utah

Ogden, Utah

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 16
Cost of living index: 20
Housing affordability: 11
Commuting: 41
Percent owning homes: 60 (55%)
Crime: 4
Education: 67
Ogden has the greatest spread between high median income and low 
cost of living.

9. Cincinnati, Ohio

Cincinnati, Ohio

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 44
Cost of living index: 24
Housing affordability: 13
Commuting: 36
Percent owning homes: 68 (64%)
Crime: 30
Education: 8

Cincinnati doesn't have any issues in these categories, being in the top half in all except percent owning homes.








10. Worcester, Massachusetts

Worcester, Massachusetts

Rankings (of 100 largest metros):
Median income: 14
Cost of living index: 71
Housing affordability: 23
Commuting: 17
Percent owning homes: 20 (70.3%)
Crime: 17
Education: 62
This metro isn't far from Boston and Hartford and is an industrial downtown yet it's close to neighborhoods like Marlborough and Shrewsbury.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

City vs. Suburb: Where will you Settle



More Americans are showing a preference for living closer into the city than the outer suburbs, according to newly released U.S. Census data. The annual rate of growth in American cities and surrounding urban areas recently surpassed exurbs for the first time in two decades.
Residential exurbs on the edge of metro areas once were a popular place for city dwellers to flock for bigger and more affordable housing options, but the trend is reversing. 
“The heyday of exurbs may well be behind us,” Robert J. Shiller, a Yale University economist, told the Associated Press. 
Rising gas prices are certainly one factor behind the shift, economists note, but demographic changes are also playing a part. More young singles are delaying marriage and having children, and thus find they don’t need the extra roominess the exurbs tend to offer in housing. Older populations are also showing greater preferences for living in walkable urban centers. 
Many outer suburbs that had been experiencing booming growth just a few years ago are now seeing growth stall. In fact, 99 of the 100 fastest-growing exurbs and outer suburbs of 2006 experienced small or no growth at all in 2011, according to Census data. (Spotsylvania County, Va., south of the Washington, D.C., metro area, was the only exception.)
“The sting of this experience may very well put the damper on the long-held view among young families and new immigrants that building a home in the outer suburbs is a quick way to achieve the American dream,” William H. Frey, a Brookings Institution demographer, told the Associated Press. 

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Provo-Orem, Heber in nation’s top 10 in growth



Provo-Orem, Heber in nation’s top 10 in growth; St. George slips and some rural Utah counties see an exodus, 2011 estimates show.






First Published Apr 04 2012 10:31 pm



Provo-Orem, Heber City and St. George — and, to a lesser extent, Salt Lake County — were among the fastest-growing places in the nation in 2011, according to new estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau.
But not everywhere in Utah is booming. Estimates also showed that rural Beaver, Carbon, Emery, Garfield, Piute and Wayne counties all lost population last year.
"It’s not that we are booming economically in Utah. But relative to other places, we are doing a little better — so that is attracting some people to come here for economic opportunity, or to stay here or move around in the state," said state demographer Juliette Ten-nert. "Also, we have a lot of natural increase [more births than deaths]. We have a high fertility rate and a lot of women in childbearing years."
The Census Bureau released 2011 population estimates on Thursday for counties, metropolitan areas and micropolitan areas (places between 10,000 and 50,000 population). Last December, it released 2011 estimates for states — which then said Utah was the second fastest-growing in the nation (behind Texas) with a 1.9 percent increase from 2010 to 2011, more than double the 0.9 percent average growth nationally.
New estimates show some areas of Utah are surging even more.
The Heber City micropolitan area, for example, grew by 3.8 percent — or four times faster than the national rate. That made Heber the seventh fastest-growing such area in the nation.
Meanwhile, the Provo-Orem metropolitan area grew by 2.7 percent, or three times the national average. It also finished as the nation’s seventh fastest-growing metropolitan area.
Metro St. George landed at No. 11 out of 366 metropolitan areas nationally with 2.6 percent growth. Metro Salt Lake City was No. 40 at 1.9 percent. Logan was No. 64 at 1.7 percent. Ogden-Clearfield was No. 77 at 1.6 percent.
Among counties with at least 10,000 population, Wasatch was the 29th fastest-growing in the nation (at 3.8 percent) and Summit was No. 36 (at 3.5 percent). By numeric jump, Salt Lake County was No. 32 in the nation (adding an estimated 19,300 people in the year) and Utah County was No. 49 (adding nearly 14,000).
Even with its relatively quick growth, Salt Lake County dropped from the nation’s 38th most populous county to No. 39 — surpassed by Travis County, Texas, home of the state capital of Austin. (A chart showing new population estimates for all counties in Utah is online at sltrib.com.)
Heber City Manager Mark Anderson explained growth there, saying, "A lot of people here work in Summit or Utah counties, but prefer to live here. It’s a little slower pace of life, with access to recreational activities and a high-quality lifestyle."
Utah County Commissioner Larry Ellertson sees numerous reasons for the relatively high growth in his county.
"Several significant businesses have located here in the past year," he said. "We also had a number of big construction projects that may have brought people here to find employment or kept some here who otherwise might have moved."
Among businesses moving or expanding in Utah County, he said, were Microsoft and Adobe. Major construction projects include the Interstate 15 rebuild and the huge new National Security Agency computer center near Camp Williams.
"We are also looking forward to some more companies coming in the near future," Ellertson said, "but they are not yet ready to announce their plans."
The commissioner also notes that Utah County has among the highest fertility rates in the nation, so most of its growth comes from births.
Pam Perlich, senior research economist at the University of Utah, said helping accelerate that trend was the recent conversion of Utah Valley University into a full university, attracting more students — many of whom marry and have children. Along with Brigham Young University, she said, that shift creates an especially high birthrate.
Growth in St. George was perhaps the most surprising and welcome.
"The recession had been worse here than in other parts of Utah," said Lecia Langston, regional economist in St. George for the Utah Department of Workforce Services. "The boom was bigger here because of the housing market, and the bust was bigger, too. It’s good to see it turning around now, but I guess that’s easier to do once you hit rock bottom."
During the decade between 2000 and 2010, St. George was the second-fastest growing metro area in the nation. The Census Bureau noted that other areas of fast growth in the previous decade have slowed dramatically as their booming housing markets collapsed.
For example, Palm Coast, Fla., fell from the No. 1 fastest-growing metro area to No. 55. And Las Vegas plunged from No. 3 to No. 155. St. George remained fairly high, slipping from No. 2 to No. 11.
The areas that lost population in Utah were all rural. The Census Bureau estimated that they all had natural increase (more births than deaths), but lost population due to people leaving — likely to find work.
Piute County had the biggest drop by percentage, 3.8 percent; followed by Wayne, 1.5 percent; Beaver and Garfield, 0.5 percent; Carbon, 0.4 percent; and Emery, 0.3 percent.